Difference between revisions of "Whom do you trust?: Validating process parameters for open-source tools"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
TimEdwards (talk | contribs) (Added abstract and roadmap. Cleaned up unneeded entries. Downloads for slides and video are left as placeholders.) |
TimEdwards (talk | contribs) (Added link to uploaded slide presentation.) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
==Downloads== | ==Downloads== | ||
* [[:File: | * [[:File:edwards_fsic2022_slides.pdf|Slides]] (TBD) | ||
* [https:peertube.f-si.org/xxxx Video recording] (TBD) | * [https:peertube.f-si.org/xxxx Video recording] (TBD) | ||
Revision as of 23:43, 1 July 2022
- Speaker: R. Timothy Edwards
- email: tim@opencircuitdesign.com or tim@efabless.com
Downloads
- Slides (TBD)
- [https:peertube.f-si.org/xxxx Video recording] (TBD)
Abstract
Foundries often provide important process data in formats that are proprietary, often not human-readable, and restricted in use to specific commercial EDA tools. As a "case study", I will discuss the long journey of obtaining trusted values for parasitic capacitance in the SkyWater sky130 open PDK. I will review how I obtained vendor data, cross-checked against an open-source field equation solver and other sources, and updated the parasitic extraction methods in the Magic VLSI layout tool to incorporate a number of effects that were previously not accounted for, and how Magic's extracted output can be used to generate data for other open-source EDA tools such as OpenROAD.
Software
General information
- Repositories: https://github.com/RTimothyEdwards/magic https://github.com/RTimothyEdwards/open_pdks
- Main documentation websites: http://opencircuitdesign.com/magic http://opencircuitdesign.com/open_pdks
Roadmap
- The project seeks help on: Curve fitting of vendor data to automatically generate coefficients for magic's analytic expressions of parasitic capacitance.